There is a proposed schedule change for the RunOffs. The proposed change would Group FM and FE (For the runoffs only). Those of you registered to race should have received an email.
Here is my response and my official positioning (opinion):
I am against the proposed change for two reasons:
1) Travel and logistic arrangements have already been made and paid for.
2) A- I understand the want to balance run group size. I also understand that based on lap times it makes “Sence” to group FM and FE. But although the FM and FE have similar lap times the two classes make their speed in different places, making it very frustrating to be on track at the same time, especially in a championship race.
B- When there is some differential in speed between classes, passes can happen with less effort between the two classes resulting in less interference between championship results.
C- This being said, the two smaller classes (FE and F5) (based on RunOffs registration numbers) should be grouped together. This would allow the two larger groups (FF and FM) to be rewarded for their participation numbers, with their own run group. This would also give the differential in speed needed to make passes happen with less interference (FE and F5)
For those of you that may have not received the letter here is an email to respond to:
Terry Ozment
TOzment@scca.com
Thanks,
Moses
Here is my response and my official positioning (opinion):
I am against the proposed change for two reasons:
1) Travel and logistic arrangements have already been made and paid for.
2) A- I understand the want to balance run group size. I also understand that based on lap times it makes “Sence” to group FM and FE. But although the FM and FE have similar lap times the two classes make their speed in different places, making it very frustrating to be on track at the same time, especially in a championship race.
B- When there is some differential in speed between classes, passes can happen with less effort between the two classes resulting in less interference between championship results.
C- This being said, the two smaller classes (FE and F5) (based on RunOffs registration numbers) should be grouped together. This would allow the two larger groups (FF and FM) to be rewarded for their participation numbers, with their own run group. This would also give the differential in speed needed to make passes happen with less interference (FE and F5)
For those of you that may have not received the letter here is an email to respond to:
Terry Ozment
TOzment@scca.com
Thanks,
Moses
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire